HYDROGEN is the simplest and most abundant of elements. Composed of one proton and one electron, it makes up 90% of our universe (by number of atoms). On Earth, hydrogen is commonly found as a diatomic molecular gas. But on Jupiter, where interior pressure is millions of times greater than that at our planet's surface, the hydrogen molecule is theorized to exist as a superhot liquid metal. The theory that hydrogen turns metallic under extreme pressure was first advanced in 1935 by Eugene Wigner, who would go on to win a 1963 Nobel Prize in physics for his work in quantum mechanics. Finding experimental evidence of Wigner's hydrogen metallization theory, however, has proven to be extremely difficult for the scientific community. While studies of the universe's lightest material led to discovery of hydrogen's solid and liquid phases, metallic hydrogen remained out of reach--until recently.1 At Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, in a series of shock compression experiments funded by Laboratory Directed Research and Development grants, we successfully ended a 60-year search for hard evidence of metallic hydrogen and the precise pressure at which metallization occurs at a particular temperature. Our success in metallizing hydrogen would not have been achieved without the shock-wave technology built up over more than two decades to support Lawrence Livermore's nuclear weapons program. It represents the integration of the Laboratory's broad capabilities and expertise in gas-gun technology, shock physics, target diagnostics, hydrodynamic computational simulations, cryogenics, and hydrogen and condensed-matter physics. Knowing what happens when matter, such as hydrogen, encounters enormously high pressure and temperature is critical for the success of the Laboratory's research in areas relevant to our science-based stockpile stewardship mission, such as nuclear explosives, conventional high explosives, and laser fusion, as well as for our collaborative efforts in planetary science research. For more than two decades, we have been helping improve that understanding through shock-compression studies using our two-stage light-gas gun (see the box below).

How Our Gas Gun Works
Our shock compression studies use a 20-meter-long, two-stage light-gas gun built by General Motors in the mid-1960s for ballistic missile studies; the gun has been in operation at the Laboratory since 1972.
The gun consists of a first-stage breech containing up to 3.5 kilograms of gunpowder and a pump tube filled with 60 grams of hydrogen, helium, or nitrogen gas; and a second-stage evacuated barrel for guiding the high-velocity impactor to its target.
Hot gases from the burning gunpowder drive a heavy (4.5- to 6.8-kilograms) piston down the pump tube, compressing the gas. At sufficiently high pressures, the gas eventually breaks a rupture valve and enters the narrow barrel, propelling a 20-gram impactor housed in the barrel toward the target.
When the impactor hits the target, it produces a high-pressure shock wave. In a fraction of a microsecond, the shock wave reverberates through the target. Diagnostic equipment, triGasGunered by the initial wave, measures the properties of the shocked material inside the target during this extremely brief period.
Projectile velocity can range from 1 to 8 kilometers per second (up to 18,000 mph). The preferred velocity is achieved by selecting the appropriate type and amount of gunpowder, driving gas (hydrogen for velocities at or above 4 kilometers per second, helium and nitrogen for lower velocities), pressure required to open the rupture valve, diameter of the barrel, and the metal and mass of the impactor.
The velocity of the shock wave, when combined with the initial conditions (impactor velocity, known densities, equation of state of the projectile and target materials) yields a precise measure of the pressure, density, and energy attained.

The gas gun permits us to fire hypervelocity projectiles into highly instrumented targets (Figure 1), shocking matter to extreme conditions for a millionth of a second or less. These experiments create pressures of a million-plus atmospheres, temperatures up to thousands of degrees depending upon the material being shocked, and densities several times that of a material's solid state. In addition to hydrogen, we have performed shock compression experiments on other liquefied gases such as nitrogen, water, carbon dioxide, oxygen, carbon monoxide, deuterium (an isotope of hydrogen), helium, and argon, and on solids such as aluminum, copper, tantalum, and carbon (graphite). Data from such experiments are used to determine a material's equation of state (EOS expresses the relationship between pressure, density, and temperature), to validate theories, and to generate reliable computational models of a material's behavior under a wide range of thermodynamic variables.

Quest for Metallic Hydrogen Under normal conditions on our planet, molecular hydrogen functions as an insulator, blocking electrical flow. Apply sufficient pressure, theory said, and hydrogen turns metallic, becoming an exceptional conductor of electricity. Theory predicted that metallization would occur when the insulating molecular solid would transform to a metallic monatomic solid at absolute zero--0 degrees kelvin (K) or -460°F. For early metallic hydrogen theorists, "sufficient pressure" was thought to be 0.2 megabars (1 bar is atmospheric pressure at sea level; a megabar, or Mbar, is a million times atmospheric pressure at sea level). Subsequent predictions pushed metallization pressure to as high as 20 Mbar. At the time our experiments were conducted, the prevailing theory predicted 3 Mbar for solid hydrogen at 0 K. For 35 years after Wigner proposed his theory, studies on metallic hydrogen were relegated to the theoretical realm because there was no way to approach the subject experimentally. By the 1970s, however, the tools of science had reached a point where it became possible to construct experiments aimed at creating conditions that theory said were required for metallization. At Lawrence Livermore, for example, one research approach2 used an explosively driven system that compressed a magnetic field and, in turn, a small sample of hydrogen to megabar pressures without shocking the hydrogen, and thus the temperature of the sample was kept very low. The early Livermore experiments generated pressures similar to those we recently reached (about 2 Mbar). While electrical conductivity was measured, the approach did not provide necessary evidence of metallization; the measurement system was only sensitive to conductivity values much less than that of a metal. In recent years, researchers at other laboratories have attempted to achieve metallization by crushing micrometer-sized samples of crystalline hydrogen in a diamond anvil cell. This small mechanical press creates very high pressures in a nanogram-sized sample when the small flat faces of two flawless diamonds are forced together, exerting megabar pressure on the sample trapped between them.3 While diamond anvil studies of hydrogen resulted in an initial claim of optical evidence for metallization, this claim was later found to not hold up.4 Significantly, there was no establishment of metallic character using optical probes. Metallic character is most directly established by electrical conductivity measurements, which are not yet possible in diamond anvil cells with hydrogen samples at any pressure. Our Approach In 1991, we began a series of experiments to determine how compression affected the electrical properties of diatomic or molecular hydrogen and deuterium both of which are insulators at ambient temperatures and pressures. Our specific objective was to advance fundamental understanding of the way hydrogen transitions from an insulator to a conductor at shock-test pressures and temperatures. Evidence of actual metallization was an unanticipated result of our experiments. It was unexpected for several reasons: (1) we used liquid hydrogen, rather than solid hydrogen that conventional wisdom indicated was required; (2) we applied a methodology--shock compression--that had never before been tried in order to metallize hydrogen; and (3) we were working at higher temperatures (3,000 K) than metallization theory specified. For our experiments, we used liquid hydrogen at an initial temperature of 20 K (-423°F) because: (1) it is easier to liquefy hydrogen than it is to solidify it in our experiments, (2) shock compression dramatically increases temperatures and turns solid hydrogen into liquid, so it made sense to begin with a liquid, and (3) only fluid hydrogen, not solid, is present in high-pressure and high-temperature systems that matter to the "real world"--in superhot, hydrogen-rich planets like Jupiter and Saturn and in fusion energy experiments like those conducted at Livermore where laser beams compress tiny spherical targets of liquid deuterium and tritium, both isotopic forms of hydrogen. As in any shock-wave experiment involving liquids, we confined the liquid hydrogen (or in some cases liquid deuterium) in a suitable target container that separated it from the vacuum of the target chamber. (Refer to Figure 1b.) The target walls had the required flat impact surface and were made of a material for which we have an accurate equation of state (aluminum) so that we could compute the pressures, densities, and temperatures reached during the experiments. The liquid hydrogen (or deuterium) was a half millimeter thick, and the target was cryogenically cooled. We sandwiched the target between two single-crystal sapphire anvils that provide stiffness and electrical insulation for the four steel electrodes implanted at the surface of the liquid hydrogen inside the target. These electrodes are used to measure the changes in the sample's electrical resistivity/conductivity during shock tests. Two of the electrodes introduce current to the inertially confined hydrogen sample, and two measure voltage across the sample. A triGasGuner pin in the target produces an electrical signal when struck by the initial shock wave, turning on the data recording system (Figure 1c) at the proper moment. The conductivity of the shocked hydrogen is thus measured before the pressure wave reaches any external surface, that is, before the sample holder blows up when the shock reaches its external surface. We mounted the anvils on aluminum plates that serve as the front and rear walls of the target, initially at 20 K. At that low temperature, the aluminum remains strong and ductile. Finally, we carefully wrapped the target with 50 layers of aluminized mylar to reduce the heat losses that would boil away the liquid hydrogen and cause our sample to literally disappear. The impactors aimed at these target samples were made of aluminum and copper embedded in plastic. Using these impactors in the gas gun, we shocked the hydrogen samples to pressures ranging from 0.9 to 1.8 Mbar and temperatures from 2,000 to 4,000 K. We designed our conductivity experiments to consist of an initial weak shock in the hydrogen followed by a series of very weak shocks reverberating between sapphire anvils, between which our hydrogen sample was sandwiched. In this way, the temperature was kept about ten times lower than it would be for a single sharp shock to the same final pressure. Each data point we recorded using the diagnostics illustrated in Figure 1c represents a measurement taken in about one ten-millionth of a second, which is more than sufficient for the sample to come into equilibrium, that is, reach a stable pressure, density, and temperature. Electrical signal levels of a few hundredths of a volt and currents of about 1 ampere lasted about 200 nanoseconds (200 ¥ 10-9 seconds), indicating that, indeed, metallization had occurred.

Our Results As shown in Figure 2, we found that from 0.9 to 1.4 Mbar, resistivity in the shocked fluid decreases almost four orders of magnitude (i.e., conductivity increases); from 1.4 to 1.8 Mbar, resistivity is essentially constant at a value typical of that of liquid metals. Our data indicate a continuous transition from a semiconducting to metallic diatomic fluid at 1.4 Mbar, nine-fold compression of initial liquid density, and 3,000 K. Some theorists have speculated that metallic hydrogen produced under laboratory conditions might remain in that state after the enormous pressures required to create it are removed. However, metallization in our experiments occurred for such a brief period of time, and in such a manner, that questions about hydrogen's superconducting properties and retention of metallic form could not be answered. At the relatively low temperature, the fluid hydrogen remained almost essentially molecular, rather than breaking into individual atoms. As a result, electrons in the sample freely flowed from molecule to molecule in a fashion that is characteristic of metals. At metallization, we calculate that only about 5% of the original molecules have separated into individual atoms of hydrogen, which means that our metallic hydrogen is primarily a molecular fluid. (Observation of this molecular metallic state in our experiments was unexpected. Only the monatomic metallic state was predicted by theory.) In looking at the insulator-to-metal transition, we focused on the changes in electronic energy band-gap (measured in electron volts) in hydrogen under shock compression. The value of the electronic band-gap is the energy that must be absorbed by an electron in order for it to contribute to electrical conduction. A zero band-gap is characteristic of a metal; a positive, nonzero band-gap is characteristic of an insulator. Thus, the magnitude of the band-gap of an insulator is a measure of how far away the insulator is from being a metal. At ambient pressure, condensed molecular hydrogen has a wide band-gap (about 15 electron volts), making it a transparent insulator, like glass. Theory said that when hydrogen is squeezed by tremendous pressure, the gap would close to zero (the band-gap of metals, which are nontransparent conductors). Our studies show that when shocked multiple times in a very cold liquid state, hydrogen becomes first a semiconductor and then a fluid metal when, as its density increases, its temperature becomes equal to the band-gap at about 0.3 electron volts (Figure 3). At this point, all the electrons that can be excited by the shock to conduct electricity have been excited. Insensitive to further decreases in band-gap, the conductivity stops changing. Our conductivity data for hydrogen are essentially the same as those for the liquid metals cesium and rubidium at 2,000 K undergoing the same transition from a semiconducting to metallic fluid. The comparison is shown in Figure 4.

Implications/Future Research Our gas-gun experiments enhance collective knowledge about the interiors of giant planets. Our earlier studies of temperature measurements of shock-compressed liquid hydrogen led us to conclude that Jupiter's molecular envelope is cooler and has much less temperature variation than previously believed. Further interpretation of those data suGasGunests that there may be no distinct boundary between Jupiter's core and mantle, as there is on Earth.6 Jupiter, which is almost 90% hydrogen, is not the only planet rich in metallic hydrogen. Hot metallic hydrogen is believed to make up the interior of Saturn and may be present in other large planets discovered recently outside our solar system. The presence of metallic hydrogen in these planets has a pronounced effect on their behavior. On Jupiter, given its extreme internal pressures, the bulk of hydrogen is most likely in the fluid metallic state; in fact, given the pressure at which hydrogen metallizes, much more metallic hydrogen--the equivalent of 50 times the mass of Earth--exists in Jupiter than previously believed. We also assume this metallic hydrogen is the source of Jupiter's very strong magnetic field, the largest of any planet in our solar system. The results of our experiments lend credence to the theory that Jupiter's magnetic field is produced not in the core, but close to the Jovian surface (Figure 5). Based on our data, it appears that the band of conductivity producing the magnetic field is much closer to the planet's surface than was thought to be the case.7 We anticipate that laser fusion scientists, who use the compressibility of hydrogen to tune laser pulses, also will find the results of our metallic hydrogen experiments extremely useful. Our experiments provide new insight into the behavior of deuterium and tritium, isotopic forms of hydrogen used in laser fusion targets. Higher fusion-energy yields could result from an improved understanding of the temperature-pressure relationship in hydrogen and its isotopes. Indeed, our hydrogen metallization studies suGasGunest strongly that the revised computation of the equation of state of hydrogen at intense pressures will help in perfecting the hydrogen-isotope-filled targets being designed for the National Ignition Facility, making their performance range broader and more flexible. This is also encouraging news for the science-based stockpile stewardship research that will eventually be performed on NIF. Future experiments will focus on (1) using various hydrogen isotopes--molecular hydrogen, deuterium, and hydrogen-deuterium--to determine the temperature dependence of the electronic energy gap, (2) exploring higher pressures up to 3 Mbar, and (3) probing effects in similar liquids such as molecular nitrogen and argon.

The most commonly asked questions about our metallic hydrogen experiments are:

1. Do any metallic systems have electrical conductivities similar to those of metallic hydrogen?
   
   Yes. The electrical conductivities of metallic fluid Cs and Rb at 2000 K are identical to those of fluid hydrogen when all three undergo the same continuous transition from a semiconducting to metallic fluid.
   
   
2. What is different about these shock experiments compared to previous ones which tried to metallize hydrogen at static high pressures in a diamond cell?
   
   We shock-heated hydrogen to about 3000 K, which produced a fluid. Previous experiments with static megabar pressures were performed at room temperature or below, which produced solid hydrogen.
   
   
3. Why does metallization occur in the fluid at a lower pressure than for the solid?
   
   Metallization in solid hydrogen is inhibited by phase transitions in crystal structure and molecular orientation. Neither exists in the disordered fluid.
   
   
4. Does any other element become metallic at a lower pressure in the fluid than in the solid?
   
   Yes. Iodine becomes metallic at 30 kbar in the fluid and 160 kbar in the solid.
   
   
5. What do you mean by a metal?
   
   Metallic fluid hydrogen is achieved when high pressures reduce the energy gap Eg between the filled valence-electron band and the unfilled conduction-electron band down to Eg~kBT, where kB is Boltzmann's constant and T is the temperature. When Eg~kBT, thermal smearing in the disordered fluid fills in the energy gap, a metallic density of electronic states is achieved, and the electronic system has a Fermi surface characteristic of a metal.
   
   
6. Why not heat hydrogen in a diamond cell to achieve the same high pressures and temperatures as in the shock experiments?
   
   Because of the high mobility of hydrogen at high temperatures, the diamond cell is essentially transparent to hydrogen diffusion. The highest recorded temperature of hydrogen in a diamond cell is 500 K. At higher temperatures the cell is empty because hydrogen diffuses away.
   
   
7. How does shock compression heat hydrogen?
   
   Because shock compression is so fast, it is also adiabatic. That is, heat produced by compression has insufficient time to be conducted or radiated away. Also, by reaching final pressure with a shock reverberating in soft hydrogen between stiff sapphire anvils, the final hydrogen temperature is about 1/10 what it would be if final pressure were reached in a single shock. In this way the temperature is about twice the melting temperature and 2% of the Fermi temperature, just the right temperature to produce melted condensed matter.
   
   
8. Why doesn't hydrogen diffuse out of a shock-compressed sample?
   
   The experiment lasts only 100 ns, too short a time for the hydrogen to diffuse away.
   
   
9. Is metallic hydrogen in thermal equilibrium?
   
   Yes. Within the 3-ns time resolution of the diagnostic system, there are ~10⁵ intermolecular collisions and 4 times as many vibrations. This number of collisions is larger by 3-4 orders of magnitude than required to achieve thermal equilibrium.
   
   
10. Is metallic hydrogen in electrical equilibrium?
    
    Yes. The thickness of the hydrogen layer decreases from the initial value of 500 mm down to the compressed value of 50 mm. The calculated flux diffusion time for a layer 50 mm thick with our highest electrical conductivity of 2000 (W-cm)^-1 is < 1 ns, which indicates that the electrical current reaches its equilibrium flow pattern in <1 ns.
    
    
11. Is the experiment affected by hydrodynamic interfacial instabilities?
    
    No. Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov instabilities did not occur when shock waves traversed the planar interfaces between sapphire and hydrogen because the initial surfaces of the sapphire crystals were optically flat (300 A rms surface roughness) and the time duration of the experiment (100 ns) was too short to allow such small instabilities to grow during the duration of the measurement.
    
    
12. Is the temperature lowered by radiative cooling?
    
    No. The temperature lost by radiation in 100 ns is <1 K out of 3000 K, a negligible amount. Thermal radiation is emitted from about 2 optical depths (640 A@) at the surface of the metallic hydrogen. The energy radiated at 3000 K was calculated from the Stefan-Boltzmann radiation law and converted to the radiated temperature using the calculated heat capacity of 2 optical depths of metallic hydrogen.
    
    
13. Is the temperature lowered by thermal conduction?
    
    No. An interfacial layer of metallic hydrogen ~0.5 mm thick is cooled about 200 K in 100 ns; both are negligible compared to the 50-mm total thickness at 3000 K. The heat conducted was calculated using values of thermal conductivity and diffusivity of metallic hydrogen calculated with the Wiedemann-Franz law; values for alumina at 1500 K, its calculated shock temperature, were taken as handbook values.
    
    
14. Is the measured conductivity caused by a metallic interfacial layer formed by high-temperature chemical reactions?
    
    No. Such a layer, if it were to exist, would be too thin after 100 ns and its electrical conductivity too small to account for the measured signal. For example, there is insufficient time to form a thin metallic layer of pure Al by the reduction of Al₂O₃ by metallic hydrogen. In 100 ns the conservatively estimated diffusion constant of H₂ into Al₂ O₃is too small for the hydrogen to get sufficiently deep inside the Al₂O₃ and the diffision constants of O₂, H₂O, and OH->are far too small for them to get out of the anvil to allow formation of a metallic layer of Al.
    
    
15. Is current carried by ions, rather than by electrons.
    
    No. Current is carried by electrons. The Drude conductivity depends inversely on the mass of the carrier. The masses of an electron and of a proton, the lightest possible ion, differ by a factor of 2000, which indicates that electronic conduction dominates. For example, the electrical conductivities of ionic alkali-halide fluids are typically about 1 (W-cm)^-1, while conductivities of pure metallic alkali fluids are typically a few 1000 (W-cm)^-1. We measured a metallic hydrogen conductivity of 2000 (W-cm)^-1.
    
    
16. Is current carried by electrons in an impurity band of H monomers in a semiconducting H₂ host, as in the degenerate doped semiconductor Si(P)?
    
    No. The electronic structures of the H atom and the H₂ molecule are very similar, which means the energy gap we observe is that of the H₂-H mixture. Also, fluid H₂ at 3000 K does not have a high dielectric constant, which means that H2 and H only interact at short range. In contrast, the electronic structure of crystalline Si and P are very different. Also, crystalline Si has a high dielectic constant, which permits dilute concentrations of P to interact at long range in a semiconducting Si host and form a conducting P impurity band in the bandgap of Si. Metallic fluid hydrogen is nothing like Si(P).
    
    
17. Is the value of the electrical resistivity of metallic hydrogen consistent with simple expectations?
    
    Yes. The measured value of 500 mW-cm is bracketed by simple models. The formula for the calculated maximum resistivity of a metal gives a value of 250 mW-cm. A calculation of the electrical resisivity using the Ziman weak-scattering model for a molecular liquid metal gives a value of 100 mW-cm. The electrical resistivity calculated in the strong-scattering free-electron model gives 1700 mW-cm. All these values are within a factor of 5 or less of the measurement, which indicates the measured value is reasonable.
    
    
18. Why has the measured resistivity value of metallic hydrogen, 500 mW-cm, not been calculated theoretically?
    
    Because no theory exists for this novel state of condensed matter. For example, tight-binding molecular-dynamics calculations indicate that the energies of translation, vibration, and rotation of H₂are all comparable in fluid metallic hydrogen. Present theories of liquid metals assume these energies are significantly different from one another.
    
    
19. If metallic hydrogen could be retained metastably on release of pressure, what properties would it have?
    
    Metallic hydrogen is speculated to have a number of interesting properties and important applications, if it could be quenched from high pressures to ambient. It is not known how, nor even whether, metallic hydrogen could be quenched to ambient but the potential benefits are enormous if it could be. For this reason it is worth speculating on possible uses of metastable solid metallic hydrogen.
    The ten times higher density of metallic DT fuel pellets, relative to molecular solid ones, would increase substantially the energy produced in laser-driven ICF, giving giant lasers, such as LLNL's NOVA and future NIF, an even larger margin for success than expected previously. The higher starting density of the fuel might produce a sufficiently large increase in ICF energy yield such that it might be possible to use only deterium as the fuel. The absence of radioactive tritium might make the ICF energy source much more attractive to commercial energy producers.
    
    Metallic solid hydrogen has been predicted to be a room-temperature superconductor, which would result in substantial energy conservation nationwide.
    
    Metastable metallic hydrogen would have a very high density of stored energy because it would have a density about ten times that of liquid H₂ at 1 bar. Thus, the stored energy released by reversion to the diatomic insulating fluid would also be very large and metastable metallic hydrogen would have widespread applications as fuels. If this energy were released relatively slowly or quickly, metallic hydrogen would be either a clean propellant, as gasoline, or an explosive, respectively. The predicted specific impulse of metallic hydrogen is about 5 times that of liquid H₂/O₂ fuel now used to launch rockets into space. This large increase in specific impulse would result in smaller cheaper spacecraft, which would greatly facilitate space travel.
    
    If solid metallic hydrogen has sufficient strength, it might be useful as a light-weight structural material. For example, automobiles made of metallic hydrogen would be ~10 times lighter than current ones made of steel, enhancing fuel efficiency and reducing conventional fuel emissions. The ideal would be to synthesize metallic hydrogen to be either extremely metastable, as diamond, for use as a structural material or readily reactive, as gasoline.
    
    Large quantities of metallic hydrogen might be made by shock recovery methods using large systems of chemical explosives, as DuPont now shock-synthesizes diamond.

Key Words: gas gun; hydrogen--fluid, liquid, metallic; Jupiter; National Ignition Facility; shock compression tests; stockpile stewardship.

References
1. S. T. Weir, A. C. Mitchell, and W. J. Nellis, "Metallization of Fluid Molecular Hydrogen," Physical Review Letters 76, 1860 (1996).
2. R. S. Hawke, et al., "Observation of Electrical Conductivity of Isentropically Compressed Hydrogen at Mbar Pressures," Physical Review Letters 41, 994 (1978).
3. "The Diamond Anvil Cell: Probing the Behavior of Metals under Ultrahigh Pressures," Science & Technology Review, UCRL-52000-3-96 (March 1996), pp. 17-27.
4. R. J. Hemley, et al., "Synchrontron Infrared Spectroscopy to 0.15 eV of H2 and D2 at Megabar Pressures," Physical Review Letters 76, 1667 (1996) and H. N. Chen, et al., "Extended Infrared Studies of High Pressure Hydrogen," Physical Review Letters 76, 1663 (1996).
5. W. J. Nellis, et al., "Electronic Energy Gap of Molecular Hydrogen from Electrical Conductivity Measurements at High Shock Pressures," Physical Review Letters 68, 2937 (1992).
6. W. J. Nellis, M. Ross, and N. C. Holmes, "Temperature Measurements of Shock-Compressed Liquid Hydrogen: Implications for the Interior of Jupiter," Science 269, 1249 (1995).
7. W. J. Nellis, S. T. Weir, and A. C. Mitchell, "Metallization and Electrical Conductivity of Hydrogen in Jupiter," Science (in press).

Physicist WILLIAM NELLIS joined the Laboratory in 1973. His specialty is the investigation of condensed matter both during and after high-pressure shock compression. The highlight of this work is the observation of the metallization of fluid hydrogen at 1.4 megabars pressure and nine-fold compression. He has delivered invited talks at 44 professional conferences since 1979 and is the author or co-author of more than 100 papers. A fellow of the American Physical Society's Division of Condensed Matter Physics, Nellis holds M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in physics from Iowa State University. He received his B.S. in physics from Loyola University of Chicago.

     
UCRL-52000

Last Changed Date: 01/21/00 -- By: kab